- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Compass Maps ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Obscure map publisher, fails WP:SIRS and only cites company's website DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Geography, and California. DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete agree with nomination. This is an insignificant company that lacks any notability. Lack potential for an article. Paul H. ( talk) 00:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Some coverage appears to exist for this, see [ [1]], [ [2]] (part 2), [ [3]], [ [4]]. However, it appears this likely doesn't meet the WP:NCORP, but I'm curious to hear what others think. Let'srun ( talk) 18:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow discussion of recently-provided sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep based on new sources. Would be nice to have a more diverse range of media documenting the company, but I think that's enough to just barely pass WP:NCORP. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 00:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: Subject just barely meets the WP:NCORP with the sources I found earlier, combined with [ [5]], there is just enough for a keep. User:Let'srun 14:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY, but if and only if, somebody adds the citations to this stub. Bearian ( talk) 20:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Compass Maps ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Obscure map publisher, fails WP:SIRS and only cites company's website DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Geography, and California. DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 22:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete agree with nomination. This is an insignificant company that lacks any notability. Lack potential for an article. Paul H. ( talk) 00:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Some coverage appears to exist for this, see [ [1]], [ [2]] (part 2), [ [3]], [ [4]]. However, it appears this likely doesn't meet the WP:NCORP, but I'm curious to hear what others think. Let'srun ( talk) 18:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow discussion of recently-provided sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:54, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep based on new sources. Would be nice to have a more diverse range of media documenting the company, but I think that's enough to just barely pass WP:NCORP. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 00:31, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep: Subject just barely meets the WP:NCORP with the sources I found earlier, combined with [ [5]], there is just enough for a keep. User:Let'srun 14:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY, but if and only if, somebody adds the citations to this stub. Bearian ( talk) 20:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.