The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 02:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Actually,
WP:MALL is rejected, but you get the idea - just a local land use project.
ShalomHello 15:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete No evidence it satisfies
WP:ORG or that it would have satisfied the rejected subject-specific notability guideline
WP:MALL.
Edison 18:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 02:07, 22 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Actually,
WP:MALL is rejected, but you get the idea - just a local land use project.
ShalomHello 15:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete No evidence it satisfies
WP:ORG or that it would have satisfied the rejected subject-specific notability guideline
WP:MALL.
Edison 18:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.