- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If somebody wants to write an article on Villa Crespo Software (On Target was my favorite of their games) they can feel free to ping me for undeletion for a merge of a line or two. The Bushranger One ping only 14:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Combination Lock (game show) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously deleted in 2010 but came back two months later. G4'd in 2011 and recently overturned due to not being a repost. No reliable sourcing whatsoever found. The show did not advance beyond pilot stage, nor are there any other reliable sources besides a couple press releases. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- I am the producer and creator of this show. So it didn't get past pilot, what does that matter? Why should it be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.251.21.87 ( talk) 21:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Because it didn't recieve any third-party coverage. And most of the article is original research that comes only from someone's first hand experience and personal opinions on the video game version. Do you really think "The game itself is not as fun as Jeopardy, but if you are trivia fans, you will likely have a lot of fun." belongs in an article? Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:46, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unsold pilots are non-notable essentially by definition, unless there's something really spectacular about them. In this case, there isn't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Agreed with comment above. Not terribly notable. I see a couple of small mentions, but nothing significant. I'm concerned with how the following (purely promotional POV) statement even survived as long as it did: " So here is your chance to try one of the rarest games and a fun gameshow game. Recommended." { C A S U K I T E T} 00:54, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. ( G· N· B· S· RS· Talk) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete—Starblind said it all. Livit⇑ Eh?/ What? 17:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If somebody wants to write an article on Villa Crespo Software (On Target was my favorite of their games) they can feel free to ping me for undeletion for a merge of a line or two. The Bushranger One ping only 14:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Combination Lock (game show) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously deleted in 2010 but came back two months later. G4'd in 2011 and recently overturned due to not being a repost. No reliable sourcing whatsoever found. The show did not advance beyond pilot stage, nor are there any other reliable sources besides a couple press releases. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 21:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- I am the producer and creator of this show. So it didn't get past pilot, what does that matter? Why should it be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.251.21.87 ( talk) 21:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Because it didn't recieve any third-party coverage. And most of the article is original research that comes only from someone's first hand experience and personal opinions on the video game version. Do you really think "The game itself is not as fun as Jeopardy, but if you are trivia fans, you will likely have a lot of fun." belongs in an article? Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:46, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete unsold pilots are non-notable essentially by definition, unless there's something really spectacular about them. In this case, there isn't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Agreed with comment above. Not terribly notable. I see a couple of small mentions, but nothing significant. I'm concerned with how the following (purely promotional POV) statement even survived as long as it did: " So here is your chance to try one of the rarest games and a fun gameshow game. Recommended." { C A S U K I T E T} 00:54, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. ( G· N· B· S· RS· Talk) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete—Starblind said it all. Livit⇑ Eh?/ What? 17:13, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.