The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy Close - The nom's previous AfD,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Mall (Missouri) (2nd nomination) just ended on June 17 with absolutely no different argument offered for deletion with this one except for a couple of comments on additional sources about this topic. AfD is not a mechanism to be abused over sour grapes due to a previous recent outcome. I also see the nom created the
first AfD which only ended in March. Instead of spending so much energy and editors' time to your deletion desire of this article, I'd advise using your time contributing content to articles and improving them. --
Oakshade (
talk)
20:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy close This was created two hours and ten minutes after the close of
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 July 29#Columbia Mall (Missouri), which was also begun by the same editor. Nom conveniently ignores the search suggestions provided in the first AfD in claiming he can't find any sources. Nom was briefly blocked recently for edit warring to get this topic redirected to Columbia, MO. Nom was asked at the DRV to explain the pattern of creating mall stubs, mall AfDs, mall DRVs, participation in mall AfDs, and attempts to redirect mall articles; at the most recent DRV, but didn't answer.
Unscintillating (
talk)
22:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy close, for all the reasons stated above. I would close this myself, but was involved in the original AfD, thus feel a certain conflict of interest. --
RoySmith(talk)01:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Speedy Close - The nom's previous AfD,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columbia Mall (Missouri) (2nd nomination) just ended on June 17 with absolutely no different argument offered for deletion with this one except for a couple of comments on additional sources about this topic. AfD is not a mechanism to be abused over sour grapes due to a previous recent outcome. I also see the nom created the
first AfD which only ended in March. Instead of spending so much energy and editors' time to your deletion desire of this article, I'd advise using your time contributing content to articles and improving them. --
Oakshade (
talk)
20:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy close This was created two hours and ten minutes after the close of
Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 July 29#Columbia Mall (Missouri), which was also begun by the same editor. Nom conveniently ignores the search suggestions provided in the first AfD in claiming he can't find any sources. Nom was briefly blocked recently for edit warring to get this topic redirected to Columbia, MO. Nom was asked at the DRV to explain the pattern of creating mall stubs, mall AfDs, mall DRVs, participation in mall AfDs, and attempts to redirect mall articles; at the most recent DRV, but didn't answer.
Unscintillating (
talk)
22:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Speedy close, for all the reasons stated above. I would close this myself, but was involved in the original AfD, thus feel a certain conflict of interest. --
RoySmith(talk)01:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.