The result was Delete. I do love the arguments that basically go something like "we should be ashamed, biting a new editor instead of helping him" but on the other hand add an "important note" to state that "and the new editor who nominated this article is a SPA". Apart from those amusing asides, consensus is clearly that the available sources are insufficient. Fram ( talk) 14:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Advertising, original research, essay. Nerfari ( talk) 18:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC) reply
*Delete Vapid vague management speak bullshit (and as my PhD was partly about organisational management, I've seen plenty). Could be covered in three lines in
Social enterprise --
Cameron Scott (
talk) 11:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete. I do love the arguments that basically go something like "we should be ashamed, biting a new editor instead of helping him" but on the other hand add an "important note" to state that "and the new editor who nominated this article is a SPA". Apart from those amusing asides, consensus is clearly that the available sources are insufficient. Fram ( talk) 14:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC) reply
Advertising, original research, essay. Nerfari ( talk) 18:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC) reply
*Delete Vapid vague management speak bullshit (and as my PhD was partly about organisational management, I've seen plenty). Could be covered in three lines in
Social enterprise --
Cameron Scott (
talk) 11:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
reply