The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If the topic becomes notable later, it can be restored.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 23:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
PROD removed by IP, no reason given. Article fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NFOOTBALL - it's a young footballer who received a dirge of identical
WP:ROUTINE articles about his big-money transfer. Nothing which demonstrates notability.
GiantSnowman 17:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 17:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator's rational and per
WP:CBALL, simply too soon. The article can always be recreated or restarted if/when the subject achieves
WP:GNG or
WP:NFOOTY.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 18:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails
NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a
fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy
GNG.
Fenix down (
talk) 10:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
He's just signed for Arsenal. I rather think the demand for deletion might be premature.
CulturalSnow (
talk) 22:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails
WP:NSPORT and
WP:GNG.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 00:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If the topic becomes notable later, it can be restored.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 23:22, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
PROD removed by IP, no reason given. Article fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NFOOTBALL - it's a young footballer who received a dirge of identical
WP:ROUTINE articles about his big-money transfer. Nothing which demonstrates notability.
GiantSnowman 17:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 17:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator's rational and per
WP:CBALL, simply too soon. The article can always be recreated or restarted if/when the subject achieves
WP:GNG or
WP:NFOOTY.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 18:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails
NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a
fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy
GNG.
Fenix down (
talk) 10:13, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
He's just signed for Arsenal. I rather think the demand for deletion might be premature.
CulturalSnow (
talk) 22:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails
WP:NSPORT and
WP:GNG.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 00:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.