The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC) reply
This article fails to establish notability - subject of this article fails WP:GNG - sources in the article lead to the company's website - other sources / external links consist of links to unreliable & questionable sources and dead links. The contributions of the article creator suggest that he created the article for promotional purposes. Amsaim ( talk) 09:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC) reply
I don't think the organization should be deleted. The organization has created impart in the society and are famous more than the following organization listed below. This listed organization have permanence in Wikipedia and are poorly written why are we fighting hard to remove this particular one. The idea to remove this project stem from Martin H who has been working hard to get it removed. maybe we need to know what forms his bias. check all related project below and tell me why this particular debated project need to be removed. I think it is prejudice. This organisation events have appeared in different newspapers and asuch it is credible. remember the sources must not neccesary be online for credibility. I have seen that printed version of the events has been include on wiki common for references. Please check the following similar organizations below and judge for yourself if this project should be deleted and why? since this sample project are far less credible than this. Montana_High_School_Association Zonta_International Association_of_Marist_Schools_of_Australia National_Students_Federation Dreams_for_Kids BBNM International_Students_Day International_Students_of_History_Association Idealist_on_Campus 128.214.11.163 ( talk) 14:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The organisation should not be deleted. I attended their workshop last week. They are credible. You can check with the patent Registry and some Finnish media. Xuci-p ( talk) 15:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC) reply
This article fails to establish notability - subject of this article fails WP:GNG - sources in the article lead to the company's website - other sources / external links consist of links to unreliable & questionable sources and dead links. The contributions of the article creator suggest that he created the article for promotional purposes. Amsaim ( talk) 09:42, 30 August 2010 (UTC) reply
I don't think the organization should be deleted. The organization has created impart in the society and are famous more than the following organization listed below. This listed organization have permanence in Wikipedia and are poorly written why are we fighting hard to remove this particular one. The idea to remove this project stem from Martin H who has been working hard to get it removed. maybe we need to know what forms his bias. check all related project below and tell me why this particular debated project need to be removed. I think it is prejudice. This organisation events have appeared in different newspapers and asuch it is credible. remember the sources must not neccesary be online for credibility. I have seen that printed version of the events has been include on wiki common for references. Please check the following similar organizations below and judge for yourself if this project should be deleted and why? since this sample project are far less credible than this. Montana_High_School_Association Zonta_International Association_of_Marist_Schools_of_Australia National_Students_Federation Dreams_for_Kids BBNM International_Students_Day International_Students_of_History_Association Idealist_on_Campus 128.214.11.163 ( talk) 14:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The organisation should not be deleted. I attended their workshop last week. They are credible. You can check with the patent Registry and some Finnish media. Xuci-p ( talk) 15:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply