The result was speedy keep as this went through DRV only one month ago. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 15:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was deleted on the grounds that it was not notable, and then un-deleted in a deletion review that failed to actually demonstrate that the subject was in fact notable. So I'm nominating it for deletion again for exactly the same reason as the first time. The article is still a basic stub (though it looks larger due to the lists of Unicode blocks), and I can't see anyone expanding it. Ptcamn 10:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep as this went through DRV only one month ago. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 15:43, 19 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was deleted on the grounds that it was not notable, and then un-deleted in a deletion review that failed to actually demonstrate that the subject was in fact notable. So I'm nominating it for deletion again for exactly the same reason as the first time. The article is still a basic stub (though it looks larger due to the lists of Unicode blocks), and I can't see anyone expanding it. Ptcamn 10:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC) reply