From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger One ping only 04:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Codacy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven / WP:SPIP. Raised $6 in funding which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia article. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger One ping only 04:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Codacy (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven / WP:SPIP. Raised $6 in funding which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia article. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook