- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 17:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
CliqIt
- CliqIt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fails the primary inclusion criteria. No significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources to establish its notability. The sources in the article are unreliable as they are nothing but a self-promotional website that anyone can add content to promote themselves. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 08:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 19:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 19:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild ( talk) 14:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete promoting a non-notable site, no coverage of the site anywhere in independent sources, fails WP:CORPDEPTH Kraxler ( talk) 03:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 11:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 17:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
CliqIt
- CliqIt ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of the article fails the primary inclusion criteria. No significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources to establish its notability. The sources in the article are unreliable as they are nothing but a self-promotional website that anyone can add content to promote themselves. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 08:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 19:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 ( T· E· C) 19:33, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild ( talk) 14:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete promoting a non-notable site, no coverage of the site anywhere in independent sources, fails WP:CORPDEPTH Kraxler ( talk) 03:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 11:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.