The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED ( talk) 22:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Re-nominated, as the request was withdrawn within an hour
3 hours, 40 minutes last time. This article is a clear violation of
WP:NPOV. The article cites many articles which would be considered editorials. I do not believe this article could possibly be re-written with a neutral point of view, as even the title seems biased. Global Warmaing is an on-going debate, just because one side disagrees with the other, it doesn't mean they are in denial.
Brougham96 (
talk)
05:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED ( talk) 22:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC) reply
Re-nominated, as the request was withdrawn within an hour
3 hours, 40 minutes last time. This article is a clear violation of
WP:NPOV. The article cites many articles which would be considered editorials. I do not believe this article could possibly be re-written with a neutral point of view, as even the title seems biased. Global Warmaing is an on-going debate, just because one side disagrees with the other, it doesn't mean they are in denial.
Brougham96 (
talk)
05:39, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
reply