The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per Nom (not to mention that based on today's changes, it would require a lot of work just to get out of the
WP:PEACOCK category).
Dori (
Talk •
Contribs) 22:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete per Nom - not notable and unhelpful article on living individual
Victuallers (
talk) 19:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete has some local notability but not enough to meet
WP:NOTE.
RMHED (
talk) 00:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete per Nom (not to mention that based on today's changes, it would require a lot of work just to get out of the
WP:PEACOCK category).
Dori (
Talk •
Contribs) 22:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete per Nom - not notable and unhelpful article on living individual
Victuallers (
talk) 19:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete has some local notability but not enough to meet
WP:NOTE.
RMHED (
talk) 00:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.