- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 14:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Clickair destinations
AfDs for this article:
- Clickair destinations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been unreferenced since 2008. It fails WP:V. A BEFORE search today brings up nothing except the use of the Clickair brand used by Vueling. As a matter of history, the article could be merged with Vueling or Vueling destinations, but it cannot sustain a separate article. Rhadow ( talk) 13:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep it absolutely can - it's an article that can be referenced and updated, which I've already started. Many sources are in Spanish since it's a Spanish airline. The fact the airline is merged/defunct has no bearing as to whether it's notable: it's whether it can be sourced properly, and even though it hasn't been around for a decade, there are still enough sources in even a cursory search. SportingFlyer talk 17:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep As you've been told several times, these articles can be verified and are notable. Knock it off with these AfD's that just seem rather POINT-y at this point. Smartyllama ( talk) 01:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the sources are there for anyone who wants to make an effort. Prince of Thieves ( talk) 12:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 14:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Clickair destinations
AfDs for this article:
- Clickair destinations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has been unreferenced since 2008. It fails WP:V. A BEFORE search today brings up nothing except the use of the Clickair brand used by Vueling. As a matter of history, the article could be merged with Vueling or Vueling destinations, but it cannot sustain a separate article. Rhadow ( talk) 13:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:29, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep it absolutely can - it's an article that can be referenced and updated, which I've already started. Many sources are in Spanish since it's a Spanish airline. The fact the airline is merged/defunct has no bearing as to whether it's notable: it's whether it can be sourced properly, and even though it hasn't been around for a decade, there are still enough sources in even a cursory search. SportingFlyer talk 17:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep As you've been told several times, these articles can be verified and are notable. Knock it off with these AfD's that just seem rather POINT-y at this point. Smartyllama ( talk) 01:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
- Keep the sources are there for anyone who wants to make an effort. Prince of Thieves ( talk) 12:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.