- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 21:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Claire Griffiths
- Claire Griffiths ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBIO, as tagged since August 2008. Primary sources do not establish notability, and searching fails to find reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 03:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The subject of this article is certainly notable, as per WP:PROF guideline 5: As a specialist in the history of West Africa, she holds a major university's chair in area studies. It is not reasonable or fair to be hypervigilant in deleting articles into which Wikipedia editors have invested considerable good-faith efforts in originating and improving. I am still endeavouring to secure more non-primary-source references; please don't hobble such efforts. — Objectivesea ( talk) 14:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:Too soon. This early career academic does not pass WP:Prof#C1 on basis of cites in GS. Eligibility for WP:Prof#C5 is too slender. and would be only a technical pass of this guideline. No prospect of WP:GNG. Investment of considerable good-faith efforts in originating and improving the BLP is worthy and welcome, but does not contribute to notability. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC).
- Delete Cannot see that Griffiths work has attracted either sufficient scholarly or general media attention to pass notability, at least, at this point in her career. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 13:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 21:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Claire Griffiths
- Claire Griffiths ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NBIO, as tagged since August 2008. Primary sources do not establish notability, and searching fails to find reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 03:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for academics. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 05:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The subject of this article is certainly notable, as per WP:PROF guideline 5: As a specialist in the history of West Africa, she holds a major university's chair in area studies. It is not reasonable or fair to be hypervigilant in deleting articles into which Wikipedia editors have invested considerable good-faith efforts in originating and improving. I am still endeavouring to secure more non-primary-source references; please don't hobble such efforts. — Objectivesea ( talk) 14:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:Too soon. This early career academic does not pass WP:Prof#C1 on basis of cites in GS. Eligibility for WP:Prof#C5 is too slender. and would be only a technical pass of this guideline. No prospect of WP:GNG. Investment of considerable good-faith efforts in originating and improving the BLP is worthy and welcome, but does not contribute to notability. Xxanthippe ( talk) 00:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC).
- Delete Cannot see that Griffiths work has attracted either sufficient scholarly or general media attention to pass notability, at least, at this point in her career. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 13:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.