The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Citrus Plaza

Citrus Plaza (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is severely lacking sufficient content. House1090 ( talk) 01:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 04:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 04:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Agreed that it lacks sufficient content. Also 2 references are dead links and one is link from the developer of this property. Expertwikiguy ( talk) 2:32 12 January 2018 (UTC)
• Delete nominator. House1090 ( talk) 06:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  •  Administrator note I've struck the above !vote as a duplicate from the nominator. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Invalid rationale and failure to attempt to improve prior to nominating. I've added more than enough sources to meet GNG. James ( ^talk/ _contribs) 20:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
• Comment "failure to attempt to improve" is not a rational argument for keeping or deleting an article, but it's very good practice to look for sources before rushing to nominate something for deletion. Mirror check. Jacona ( talk) 00:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC) reply

My language was not clear and I appreciate you pointing that out. I meant to refer to WP:BEFORE, particularly in that an article which is “severely lacking sufficient content” “can be fixed through normal editing [and] is not a candidate for AfD”. I will endeavor to ensure clarity in my comments in the future. What is a “mirror check”? James ( ^talk/ _contribs) 05:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.