The result was keep. -Scottywong | talk _ 17:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable neologism ( WP:N) apparently coined in a blog post in 2011 ( [1]) and since not picked up, as far as I can tell, by reliable sources. Blogs are not reliable sources ( WP:SPS), and the examples and definitions given are original research ( WP:OR) insofar as they go beyond the blog post. While I agree that the article is very likely broadly true, our inclusion criterium is verifiability rather than truth ( WP:V), and therefore we need to delete or userfy the article as an original research essay. Sandstein 04:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment If kept the term should not be bolted onto the beginning of a number of articles as it was before this AfD began. The inclusion of the article is not a licence to wikilink to hundreds of articles. Darrenhusted ( talk) 16:49, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -Scottywong | talk _ 17:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable neologism ( WP:N) apparently coined in a blog post in 2011 ( [1]) and since not picked up, as far as I can tell, by reliable sources. Blogs are not reliable sources ( WP:SPS), and the examples and definitions given are original research ( WP:OR) insofar as they go beyond the blog post. While I agree that the article is very likely broadly true, our inclusion criterium is verifiability rather than truth ( WP:V), and therefore we need to delete or userfy the article as an original research essay. Sandstein 04:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC) reply
Comment If kept the term should not be bolted onto the beginning of a number of articles as it was before this AfD began. The inclusion of the article is not a licence to wikilink to hundreds of articles. Darrenhusted ( talk) 16:49, 11 May 2012 (UTC) reply