From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sufficient coverage; these links can be added: 1, 2, 3 ( non-admin closure) Ethically Yours! 12:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Cinematic Music Group

Cinematic Music Group (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination started by 68.184.12.79 ( talk · contribs). Their reason given in the edit summary was "Some material are unsourced and not referenced correctly. It is now noted for deletion". I passed this submission through Articles for creation but am neutral on the result. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - no valid deletion rationale has been offered. "Unsourced material" (of which there is very little) is not a reason for deletion. In terms of notability, this music label has signed multiple notable artists, which is usually a strong indicator of notability. It also has sufficient RS coverage to meet the GNG. -- ThaddeusB ( talk) 18:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sufficient coverage; these links can be added: 1, 2, 3 ( non-admin closure) Ethically Yours! 12:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Cinematic Music Group

Cinematic Music Group (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination started by 68.184.12.79 ( talk · contribs). Their reason given in the edit summary was "Some material are unsourced and not referenced correctly. It is now noted for deletion". I passed this submission through Articles for creation but am neutral on the result. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - no valid deletion rationale has been offered. "Unsourced material" (of which there is very little) is not a reason for deletion. In terms of notability, this music label has signed multiple notable artists, which is usually a strong indicator of notability. It also has sufficient RS coverage to meet the GNG. -- ThaddeusB ( talk) 18:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook