The result was delete. BigDom talk 07:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Second nomination, the previous nomination was in 2006. It is a very well-written article, and seemingly well-sourced, but all sources seem to be first-party sources. I cannot find any independant sources to confer notability for the subject. She seems like a nice woman, but she at this time doesn't meet the notability requirements for inclusion on Wikipedia. Angryapathy ( talk) 21:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. BigDom talk 07:57, 12 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Second nomination, the previous nomination was in 2006. It is a very well-written article, and seemingly well-sourced, but all sources seem to be first-party sources. I cannot find any independant sources to confer notability for the subject. She seems like a nice woman, but she at this time doesn't meet the notability requirements for inclusion on Wikipedia. Angryapathy ( talk) 21:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC) reply