The result was delete, merge and rename as provided by Metropolitan. ÷ seresin 01:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Articles
( View log) First 4 articles have no content other than a definition. Given the context, the reference for the article is probably not a reliable source. The article itself is debatedly POV pushing. In the case of Christianophobia in England appears to be POV pushing, for example it ignores the fact that the complaint to the ASA against the Gay Police Officers Association was only upheld in Part. Secondly, the highly partisan Daily Mail is not a reliable source on these issues (if not most political issues). Life-Site News appears to be even more partisan. Pit-yacker ( talk) 18:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete them all or at least userfy, combine and rename. The anecdotes listed in the England article are only "phobia" like responses when viewed from your POV. Maybe discrimination, but I see no way that the name of the articles can remain as is without being completely POV. That being said I think it will be very very difficult to write balanced articles at all. I suggest working on existing articles. Beach drifter ( talk) 18:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, merge and rename as provided by Metropolitan. ÷ seresin 01:55, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Articles
( View log) First 4 articles have no content other than a definition. Given the context, the reference for the article is probably not a reliable source. The article itself is debatedly POV pushing. In the case of Christianophobia in England appears to be POV pushing, for example it ignores the fact that the complaint to the ASA against the Gay Police Officers Association was only upheld in Part. Secondly, the highly partisan Daily Mail is not a reliable source on these issues (if not most political issues). Life-Site News appears to be even more partisan. Pit-yacker ( talk) 18:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete them all or at least userfy, combine and rename. The anecdotes listed in the England article are only "phobia" like responses when viewed from your POV. Maybe discrimination, but I see no way that the name of the articles can remain as is without being completely POV. That being said I think it will be very very difficult to write balanced articles at all. I suggest working on existing articles. Beach drifter ( talk) 18:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC) reply