The result was keep. – MuZemike 22:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable individual lacking GHits of substance and with zero GNEWS. Article has a number of references, but most are primary sources. In addition, there are a number of unreviewable references where the title of the reference implies the subject of the Wikipedia article is not the subject of the reference. ttonyb ( talk) 01:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep (Re-stating my position in a clearer manner).
For these reasons, I think the article should be kept. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. – MuZemike 22:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable individual lacking GHits of substance and with zero GNEWS. Article has a number of references, but most are primary sources. In addition, there are a number of unreviewable references where the title of the reference implies the subject of the Wikipedia article is not the subject of the reference. ttonyb ( talk) 01:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep (Re-stating my position in a clearer manner).
For these reasons, I think the article should be kept. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC) reply