The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Feel free to create a redirect from this page title to an appropriate target article. Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable director with only two films, BEFORE shows no coverage or critical discussion of the person. Could perhaps redirect to "Sparks (film)", his more notable work. While they don't appear in the article, Rotten Tomatoes shows reviews of the film in Village Voice and a few other publications, so it would pass GNG. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Feel free to create a redirect from this page title to an appropriate target article. Liz Read! Talk! 04:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable director with only two films, BEFORE shows no coverage or critical discussion of the person. Could perhaps redirect to "Sparks (film)", his more notable work. While they don't appear in the article, Rotten Tomatoes shows reviews of the film in Village Voice and a few other publications, so it would pass GNG. Oaktree b ( talk) 01:04, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)