From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Prism (Katy Perry album). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 10:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Choose Your Battles (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its been two years since the last clubbed AFD (where this article was part of a clubbed Afd and it was decided that each article should be discussed separately). I fail to see how this still passes WP:NSONGS. The first 4 references all have passing mentions about the song, as well as what Perry thinks of it. There for it does not have an independent third party notability where a reliable source discusses on the song and its accompaniment. The next set of references (from 5 - 13) all have passable mentions about the song, like how they conduct in Album reviews and minor composition details from Musicnotes. Lastly, the song had obtained a feeble chart position in a minor market chart like that of South Korea. I fail to see how keeping this is of beneficial therefore this can easily be deleted. — IB [ Poke ] 10:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per WP:NSONGS since just about all the valuable content is already in Prism (Katy Perry album), and this doesn't really have any quality independent coverage outside of album reviews. An artist's own commentary on works isn't enough by itself either as that would just be self-promotion. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:NSONGS. Although I appreciate and respect all the hard work the editor has contributed to making this a very well written and substantial article (Thank you Aaron, for your outstanding work for the KP WikiProject!!), this ultimately comes down to a lack of notability. It was not leaked prior to album release, released as a promo or radio single, nor did it garner multiple in-depths reviews that really discuss the background, composition, or notability? I feel with proper editing, the information this article possesses would greatly contribute to the main "Prism" article. Giacobbe talk 22:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Prism (Katy Perry album). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 10:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Choose Your Battles (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its been two years since the last clubbed AFD (where this article was part of a clubbed Afd and it was decided that each article should be discussed separately). I fail to see how this still passes WP:NSONGS. The first 4 references all have passing mentions about the song, as well as what Perry thinks of it. There for it does not have an independent third party notability where a reliable source discusses on the song and its accompaniment. The next set of references (from 5 - 13) all have passable mentions about the song, like how they conduct in Album reviews and minor composition details from Musicnotes. Lastly, the song had obtained a feeble chart position in a minor market chart like that of South Korea. I fail to see how keeping this is of beneficial therefore this can easily be deleted. — IB [ Poke ] 10:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete per WP:NSONGS since just about all the valuable content is already in Prism (Katy Perry album), and this doesn't really have any quality independent coverage outside of album reviews. An artist's own commentary on works isn't enough by itself either as that would just be self-promotion. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 13:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:NSONGS. Although I appreciate and respect all the hard work the editor has contributed to making this a very well written and substantial article (Thank you Aaron, for your outstanding work for the KP WikiProject!!), this ultimately comes down to a lack of notability. It was not leaked prior to album release, released as a promo or radio single, nor did it garner multiple in-depths reviews that really discuss the background, composition, or notability? I feel with proper editing, the information this article possesses would greatly contribute to the main "Prism" article. Giacobbe talk 22:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook