The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This video game has not yet been the subject of discussion in multiple reliable independent verifiable sources anywhere. The only references provided are to the subject's own website (2) and to another site that only shows a schedule of play (1). We have no subject-specific notability guidelines for video games, and this one does not appear to meet our
General Notability Guidelines.
A loose necktie (
talk)
22:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I have looked at these sources. One of them is once again to the Choker website-- this is exactly the kind of source that may not be used here because it lacks independence from the subject. The second one, however, to Poker Tube, may be legitimate. It has in depth discussion, and appears to be independent. I do not know how reliable the source is, but it may mean that the subject now qualifies as notable after all. You will need to find at least one more source like this to satisfy the "multiple" part of
WP:GNG. Am withholding judgement pending more input here.
A loose necktie (
talk)
15:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Merge as the previous voters have stated. Sources 1-3 are more or less primary, while source 5 is, as stated above, basically an advertisement. While there is information about the subject, it is very difficult to maintain NPOV using the sources currently on the article. A web search turned up
[1], which could help maintain NPOV, as it has a short section criticizing the app for bugginess. However, this leaves ~1.5 sources counting towards GNG, not of especially high quality, which is not enough for me.
Toadspike (
talk)
16:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This video game has not yet been the subject of discussion in multiple reliable independent verifiable sources anywhere. The only references provided are to the subject's own website (2) and to another site that only shows a schedule of play (1). We have no subject-specific notability guidelines for video games, and this one does not appear to meet our
General Notability Guidelines.
A loose necktie (
talk)
22:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)reply
I have looked at these sources. One of them is once again to the Choker website-- this is exactly the kind of source that may not be used here because it lacks independence from the subject. The second one, however, to Poker Tube, may be legitimate. It has in depth discussion, and appears to be independent. I do not know how reliable the source is, but it may mean that the subject now qualifies as notable after all. You will need to find at least one more source like this to satisfy the "multiple" part of
WP:GNG. Am withholding judgement pending more input here.
A loose necktie (
talk)
15:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Merge as the previous voters have stated. Sources 1-3 are more or less primary, while source 5 is, as stated above, basically an advertisement. While there is information about the subject, it is very difficult to maintain NPOV using the sources currently on the article. A web search turned up
[1], which could help maintain NPOV, as it has a short section criticizing the app for bugginess. However, this leaves ~1.5 sources counting towards GNG, not of especially high quality, which is not enough for me.
Toadspike (
talk)
16:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.