- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 19:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Chocolate Crunchies
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chocolate Crunchies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I noticed that this content really doesn't deserve its own article a while back (going as far as to merge everything here to the Ice cream cake article recently. When User:Zaki Naggar posted on the talk page yesterday that he also expressed concerns over this, I went ahead and AfDed this now.
I've done a WP:BEFORE and noticed that there are a significant amount of articles on this subject so while one may argue that it passes GNG, I do not think this is notable. I would like to hear more on this, and if enough Keep votes come in without any Redirect/Deletes, I'll withdraw the nom soon.
I must point out, however, that the coverage on Chocolate Crunchies is 90% just articles on how to make them, use them, or ingredient lists provided by companies like Carvel. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment If you already merged the content (step 1 of WP:MERGETEXT), then continue the merge by creating a redirect (step 2 of WP:MERGETEXT), both for attribution and in case anyone objects and wants to revert. There's no obvious reason here to stop after step 1, and the only other editor who has touched that article or talk page since 2015 has supported your merge. I encourage you to continue being WP:BOLD by withdrawing this nomination and finishing the merge with a redirect per WP:MERGETEXT. Bakazaka ( talk) 06:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 19:14, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Chocolate Crunchies
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chocolate Crunchies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I noticed that this content really doesn't deserve its own article a while back (going as far as to merge everything here to the Ice cream cake article recently. When User:Zaki Naggar posted on the talk page yesterday that he also expressed concerns over this, I went ahead and AfDed this now.
I've done a WP:BEFORE and noticed that there are a significant amount of articles on this subject so while one may argue that it passes GNG, I do not think this is notable. I would like to hear more on this, and if enough Keep votes come in without any Redirect/Deletes, I'll withdraw the nom soon.
I must point out, however, that the coverage on Chocolate Crunchies is 90% just articles on how to make them, use them, or ingredient lists provided by companies like Carvel. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. –– Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment If you already merged the content (step 1 of WP:MERGETEXT), then continue the merge by creating a redirect (step 2 of WP:MERGETEXT), both for attribution and in case anyone objects and wants to revert. There's no obvious reason here to stop after step 1, and the only other editor who has touched that article or talk page since 2015 has supported your merge. I encourage you to continue being WP:BOLD by withdrawing this nomination and finishing the merge with a redirect per WP:MERGETEXT. Bakazaka ( talk) 06:36, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.