- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 15:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Chloe Early
- Chloe Early ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass NARTIST. No significant critical studies or works in major museums.. DGG ( talk ) 01:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:14, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'd say she passes GNG, with article references 3, 4 and 6, as well as this. Keep Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment, thanks for that reference Shawn in Montreal, i have incorporated it into the article. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment none of these are significant critical studies. NARTIST is usually seen as an additional or alternative requirement to the GNG, and she does not meet it. DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG. Hmlarson ( talk) 01:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Irish Independent and other sources seem to cover WP:GNG. Pam D 10:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 15:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Chloe Early
- Chloe Early ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass NARTIST. No significant critical studies or works in major museums.. DGG ( talk ) 01:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:14, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 12:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'd say she passes GNG, with article references 3, 4 and 6, as well as this. Keep Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 14:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment, thanks for that reference Shawn in Montreal, i have incorporated it into the article. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment none of these are significant critical studies. NARTIST is usually seen as an additional or alternative requirement to the GNG, and she does not meet it. DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG. Hmlarson ( talk) 01:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Irish Independent and other sources seem to cover WP:GNG. Pam D 10:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.