The result was no consensus. No consensus to delete, a merger can continue to be discussed at the talk page. Sandstein 06:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply
It has been suggested that this article fails WP:POVFORK, and WP:Criticism says "Creating separate articles with the sole purpose of grouping the criticisms or to elaborate individual points of criticism on a certain topic would usually be considered a POV fork", as well as "Don't make articles entirely devoted to criticism of a topic that has or should have its own Wikipedia article.". In addition, the creator was told by an admin NOT to create an article entitled 'Critical views of chiropractic' as it would be a "classic pov-fork". [1] - procedural nomination for Ip 70.71.22.45 -- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 04:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. No consensus to delete, a merger can continue to be discussed at the talk page. Sandstein 06:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply
It has been suggested that this article fails WP:POVFORK, and WP:Criticism says "Creating separate articles with the sole purpose of grouping the criticisms or to elaborate individual points of criticism on a certain topic would usually be considered a POV fork", as well as "Don't make articles entirely devoted to criticism of a topic that has or should have its own Wikipedia article.". In addition, the creator was told by an admin NOT to create an article entitled 'Critical views of chiropractic' as it would be a "classic pov-fork". [1] - procedural nomination for Ip 70.71.22.45 -- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 04:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC) reply