- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Chinese Imperial Dog
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chinese Imperial Dog ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG, no RS to support it is a breed. Despite what the article says this "breed" does not appear to be recognised by any breed registry, I have searched the FCI, AKC, ANKC, CKC, KC, NZKC & UKC websites, I have also tried Chinese Kennel Union webpage but my translations could be eschew, that being said as a full member of FCI, any breed recognised by the CKU would be granted FCI recognition. I have found this Reuters story about “China's imperial dog”, but it is referring to the Pekingese. Google shows up the usual "owners guides" and "complete owners manuals" from the same authors that pump out identical books retitled for every breed/crossbreed imaginable. Cavalryman ( talk) 23:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails GNG and depends on the "Dog Breed Info Center" website for material.
William Harris
talk
07:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC) - Delete as per nom. Looks like a rather small Shih Tzu to me. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 21:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable enough at this point in time, fails GNG. ~ riley ( talk) 23:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Chinese Imperial Dog
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chinese Imperial Dog ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG, no RS to support it is a breed. Despite what the article says this "breed" does not appear to be recognised by any breed registry, I have searched the FCI, AKC, ANKC, CKC, KC, NZKC & UKC websites, I have also tried Chinese Kennel Union webpage but my translations could be eschew, that being said as a full member of FCI, any breed recognised by the CKU would be granted FCI recognition. I have found this Reuters story about “China's imperial dog”, but it is referring to the Pekingese. Google shows up the usual "owners guides" and "complete owners manuals" from the same authors that pump out identical books retitled for every breed/crossbreed imaginable. Cavalryman ( talk) 23:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails GNG and depends on the "Dog Breed Info Center" website for material.
William Harris
talk
07:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Looks like a rather small Shih Tzu to me. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 21:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 02:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Stuartyeates ( talk) 08:03, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable enough at this point in time, fails GNG. ~ riley ( talk) 23:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.