From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation

Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. A search for reliable sources gives enough proof that the organisation exists, but no significant coverage. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 10:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Fails NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ++ 12:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation

Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. A search for reliable sources gives enough proof that the organisation exists, but no significant coverage. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 10:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Fails NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ++ 12:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook