- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Chetan k pandya
- Chetan k pandya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Run of the mill lawyer. None of the sources even approach significant coverage of the lawyer himself, and nothing more was found in a search. The 'specializations in' bit makes it cler that this article is intended as a promo piece. — InsertCleverPhraseHere ( or here) 12:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet inclusion criteria for lawyers. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 01:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 01:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 14:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 14:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 16:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: The sources provided are a mix of firm listings and blogs, plus a court listing which provides basic verification of a man going about his business. Nothing provided or found through my searches indicates encyclopaedic notability of the subject. AllyD ( talk) 16:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's rationale. Alexius08 ( talk) 00:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Chetan k pandya
- Chetan k pandya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Run of the mill lawyer. None of the sources even approach significant coverage of the lawyer himself, and nothing more was found in a search. The 'specializations in' bit makes it cler that this article is intended as a promo piece. — InsertCleverPhraseHere ( or here) 12:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet inclusion criteria for lawyers. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 01:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 01:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 14:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 14:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 16:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: The sources provided are a mix of firm listings and blogs, plus a court listing which provides basic verification of a man going about his business. Nothing provided or found through my searches indicates encyclopaedic notability of the subject. AllyD ( talk) 16:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's rationale. Alexius08 ( talk) 00:00, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.