The result was delete. Proto:: ► 10:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable television show. fancruft.-- Ixoal 14:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Also page 1 of that article gives a substantial amount of information about Cherub: [ http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,71084-0.html?tw=wn_story_page_prev2 Wired article about Cherub, page 1}
According to official policy ( Wikipedia:Deletion policy) I thought articles were only supposed to be deleted if they were unverifiable, if they contained original research, or if they were point of view? My understanding is that Wikipedia:Notability is only a guideline, and a disputed one at that (as I write this that article has a tag pointing out some people disagree it even deserves 'guideline' status). Non-notable articles often get deleted because they often break one or more of these three important things, but Cherub is verifiable (see the official site, Stranger set report, and Wired article), the article is non-POV, and does not contain original research. Therefore I see no justification for deletion. A lot of work went into the creation of this article, I think it deserves to be fairly judged by official Wikipedia policy.
I suggest keeping it, or merging it with content at Buffyverse (Fan made productions) (though that article has also been put on AfD, i propose it could be saved and include content from the indivdual fan films that have have verifiable sources), I could tidy that article to make it more respectable (including all purging all the info on fanfic apart from the more notable fan films). In 10 years, close to thousands of people including me will remember Cherub as one of the first online series. People are right that it is not that notable but it is slightly notable :) -- Paxomen 10:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Proto:: ► 10:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC) reply
non notable television show. fancruft.-- Ixoal 14:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Also page 1 of that article gives a substantial amount of information about Cherub: [ http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,71084-0.html?tw=wn_story_page_prev2 Wired article about Cherub, page 1}
According to official policy ( Wikipedia:Deletion policy) I thought articles were only supposed to be deleted if they were unverifiable, if they contained original research, or if they were point of view? My understanding is that Wikipedia:Notability is only a guideline, and a disputed one at that (as I write this that article has a tag pointing out some people disagree it even deserves 'guideline' status). Non-notable articles often get deleted because they often break one or more of these three important things, but Cherub is verifiable (see the official site, Stranger set report, and Wired article), the article is non-POV, and does not contain original research. Therefore I see no justification for deletion. A lot of work went into the creation of this article, I think it deserves to be fairly judged by official Wikipedia policy.
I suggest keeping it, or merging it with content at Buffyverse (Fan made productions) (though that article has also been put on AfD, i propose it could be saved and include content from the indivdual fan films that have have verifiable sources), I could tidy that article to make it more respectable (including all purging all the info on fanfic apart from the more notable fan films). In 10 years, close to thousands of people including me will remember Cherub as one of the first online series. People are right that it is not that notable but it is slightly notable :) -- Paxomen 10:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC) reply