The result was delete. Black Kite ( talk) 10:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Extremely inappropriately worded for an encyclopedia article, and has a very strong feeling of hoax to it (in particular, none of the cited links are actually links, and the four links to alleged Chinese Wikipedia articles all do not exist). Unless somehow this can be established as real and sufficiently notable, iDelete it. -- Nlu ( talk) 21:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Black Kite ( talk) 10:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Extremely inappropriately worded for an encyclopedia article, and has a very strong feeling of hoax to it (in particular, none of the cited links are actually links, and the four links to alleged Chinese Wikipedia articles all do not exist). Unless somehow this can be established as real and sufficiently notable, iDelete it. -- Nlu ( talk) 21:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC) reply