The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep this photographer is clearly notable per non-passing coverage in significant books. The bad news is summarized in the intro and actually goes beyond: the article is a product of a blog that culminated in a self-published book (or the other way around) and in all fairness could be viewed as promotion for these. The article should be cleaned up from most references and a new set of references should be added (since current valid references underwrite facts, NOT notability). IF the conclusion of this AfD is the same as my conclusion (and that remains be seen!), I am willing to cleanup and reference. Just leave a note on my talk page if help is needed.
gidonb (
talk) 02:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Note I have updated the endnotes of this page to include more books. 12 October 2017 ... kindly look it over. Thanks.
Don't know how to update the wiki page with the image. Hoping someone will kindly lend support and assistance. A million thanks. 10/12/2017
Hi
Arthistorian1977, are the improvements in referencing sufficient in your opinion for withdrawing the nomination?
gidonb (
talk) 19:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
After looking second time, I do withdraw my nomination.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 05:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Anon, we can't help you because the copyrights are unclear. Also please refrain from making hostile statements yourself.
gidonb (
talk) 02:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep this photographer is clearly notable per non-passing coverage in significant books. The bad news is summarized in the intro and actually goes beyond: the article is a product of a blog that culminated in a self-published book (or the other way around) and in all fairness could be viewed as promotion for these. The article should be cleaned up from most references and a new set of references should be added (since current valid references underwrite facts, NOT notability). IF the conclusion of this AfD is the same as my conclusion (and that remains be seen!), I am willing to cleanup and reference. Just leave a note on my talk page if help is needed.
gidonb (
talk) 02:18, 11 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Note I have updated the endnotes of this page to include more books. 12 October 2017 ... kindly look it over. Thanks.
Don't know how to update the wiki page with the image. Hoping someone will kindly lend support and assistance. A million thanks. 10/12/2017
Hi
Arthistorian1977, are the improvements in referencing sufficient in your opinion for withdrawing the nomination?
gidonb (
talk) 19:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
After looking second time, I do withdraw my nomination.
Arthistorian1977 (
talk) 05:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Anon, we can't help you because the copyrights are unclear. Also please refrain from making hostile statements yourself.
gidonb (
talk) 02:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.