- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was moved to Draft:Chaos Flare. There is a consensus that the article can not remain in mainspace as it is. It can be improved in draft space if sources become available; if it is not improved, it will automatically be deleted as abandoned in six months. bd2412 T 00:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chaos Flare ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article on a game lacks any sources of any kind. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com doesn't find any. Fails GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 10:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford ( talk) 10:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Improper nom by clueless editor The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego"
[1]. Nobody who does not understand the text of a Wikipedia article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion.
Newimpartial (
talk)
15:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Chetsford ( talk) 16:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Chetsford ( talk) 16:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to List of role-playing games by name. There are numerous citations on the Japanese version of this article. BOZ ( talk) 18:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Move to Draft for now (unless somebody can translate Japanese sources) and eventually merge content and redirect to a new article on Anime RPGs, an undoubtedly notable topic that will allow relevant content to be brought together in one place. I think this works better than using the List of role-playing games for something other than its intended purpose. Newimpartial ( talk) 21:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I will add that I have no way of evaluating the 16 citations on the Japanese version of this article. BOZ ( talk) 20:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: And a request for anyone with a capability to review the sources on the japanese version to do so
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear ( talk) 11:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Unsourced, no notability established therefore. Redditaddict 6 9 22:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was moved to Draft:Chaos Flare. There is a consensus that the article can not remain in mainspace as it is. It can be improved in draft space if sources become available; if it is not improved, it will automatically be deleted as abandoned in six months. bd2412 T 00:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chaos Flare ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article on a game lacks any sources of any kind. A search on Google News, JSTOR, and newspapers.com doesn't find any. Fails GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 10:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford ( talk) 10:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Improper nom by clueless editor The nom apparently believes that tabletop roleplaying rules are "designed to be used for the play of a game exactly like Monopoly or Stratego"
[1]. Nobody who does not understand the text of a Wikipedia article in its plain meaning can legitimately nominate that article for deletion.
Newimpartial (
talk)
15:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Chetsford ( talk) 16:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Chetsford ( talk) 16:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to List of role-playing games by name. There are numerous citations on the Japanese version of this article. BOZ ( talk) 18:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Move to Draft for now (unless somebody can translate Japanese sources) and eventually merge content and redirect to a new article on Anime RPGs, an undoubtedly notable topic that will allow relevant content to be brought together in one place. I think this works better than using the List of role-playing games for something other than its intended purpose. Newimpartial ( talk) 21:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:45, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I will add that I have no way of evaluating the 16 citations on the Japanese version of this article. BOZ ( talk) 20:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: And a request for anyone with a capability to review the sources on the japanese version to do so
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear ( talk) 11:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Unsourced, no notability established therefore. Redditaddict 6 9 22:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.