The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (
non-admin closure). The consensus here is clearly in favor of keeping this article, given its significant coverage in
WP:RS and accordant passage of
WP:GNG.
North of Eden (
talk) 01:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Subject is covered independently in multiple reliable sources, so even though it wasn't built it would seem to satisfy the
General Notability Guidelines. --
Scjessey (
talk) 18:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (
non-admin closure). The consensus here is clearly in favor of keeping this article, given its significant coverage in
WP:RS and accordant passage of
WP:GNG.
North of Eden (
talk) 01:00, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Subject is covered independently in multiple reliable sources, so even though it wasn't built it would seem to satisfy the
General Notability Guidelines. --
Scjessey (
talk) 18:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.