- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cerro Cesius ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Total failure of WP:V and has been since creation. I will happily withdraw this nomination if anyone can even provide so much as a scrap of proof that such a mountain exists, but to the greatest extent of my ability to search, I have not been able to do so. GEOnet shows no results for the word "cesius" in Chile, and since "cerro" means mountain, that nets you, oh, 6000+ results, so that doesn't help.
Absolutely zero hits on Google or GBooks. Every hit I found was a false positive - typos, hits on similar words, or instances where a sentence ends with Cerro and the next one starts with Cesius, or vice versa. No article on any other wiki to swipe sources from. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:V, even if it does exist it fails WP:GEOLAND. There are a large number of named and unnamed peaks in the Chilean Andes that would fail WP:GEOLAND where no information beyond statistics and coordinates exist e.g. [1], and here is a list of 40 peaks from 4270 to 4293M elevation, all sourced to maps, only some of which are named, and that's the 49th page of 40 for Chilean mountains.---- Pontificalibus 09:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. I can't find any evidence that this mountain exists. SailingInABathTub ( talk) 12:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Although I found this totally legitimate word search for mountains in Chile which includes Cerro Cesius, that's literally the only thing I could find that wasn't ripped off from Wikipedia. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 16:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- It exists. I tracked it down on a map. It appears to be a typo that's manifested across Wikipedia languages. There's not much on Cerro Ceusis apart from a mention in a scholarly journal and a listing in a Chilean governmental document. [2] SportingFlyer T· C 00:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- SportingFlyer, thanks for finding that. I tried to double check to see if there were any further sources that would show the topic meets WP:GEOLAND, but I can't find any, so ultimately I'm still in favor of not having a standalone. But I wouldn't argue with a redirect to maybe List of mountains in the Andes (under the corrected spelling, of course). ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- I think a redirect makes a lot of sense. I know this isn't technically evidence of anything, but the fact this can go unnoticed for so long clearly shows it's not notable. SportingFlyer T· C 10:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - per above, this is an incorrect name, and the actual mountain probably isn't notable. A redirect from the correct spelling would make sense, but I don't think we should be propagating an error by having this spelling. Hog Farm Talk 14:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Agree - should probably have written "a redirect makes a lot of sense, from the correct spelling."
SportingFlyer
T·
C
15:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- And a redirect from the wrong spelling too, since its propagated around the internet, even to internet word search websites! ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 15:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Agree - should probably have written "a redirect makes a lot of sense, from the correct spelling."
SportingFlyer
T·
C
15:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cerro Cesius ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Total failure of WP:V and has been since creation. I will happily withdraw this nomination if anyone can even provide so much as a scrap of proof that such a mountain exists, but to the greatest extent of my ability to search, I have not been able to do so. GEOnet shows no results for the word "cesius" in Chile, and since "cerro" means mountain, that nets you, oh, 6000+ results, so that doesn't help.
Absolutely zero hits on Google or GBooks. Every hit I found was a false positive - typos, hits on similar words, or instances where a sentence ends with Cerro and the next one starts with Cesius, or vice versa. No article on any other wiki to swipe sources from. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:V, even if it does exist it fails WP:GEOLAND. There are a large number of named and unnamed peaks in the Chilean Andes that would fail WP:GEOLAND where no information beyond statistics and coordinates exist e.g. [1], and here is a list of 40 peaks from 4270 to 4293M elevation, all sourced to maps, only some of which are named, and that's the 49th page of 40 for Chilean mountains.---- Pontificalibus 09:56, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. I can't find any evidence that this mountain exists. SailingInABathTub ( talk) 12:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Although I found this totally legitimate word search for mountains in Chile which includes Cerro Cesius, that's literally the only thing I could find that wasn't ripped off from Wikipedia. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 16:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- It exists. I tracked it down on a map. It appears to be a typo that's manifested across Wikipedia languages. There's not much on Cerro Ceusis apart from a mention in a scholarly journal and a listing in a Chilean governmental document. [2] SportingFlyer T· C 00:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- SportingFlyer, thanks for finding that. I tried to double check to see if there were any further sources that would show the topic meets WP:GEOLAND, but I can't find any, so ultimately I'm still in favor of not having a standalone. But I wouldn't argue with a redirect to maybe List of mountains in the Andes (under the corrected spelling, of course). ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- I think a redirect makes a lot of sense. I know this isn't technically evidence of anything, but the fact this can go unnoticed for so long clearly shows it's not notable. SportingFlyer T· C 10:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - per above, this is an incorrect name, and the actual mountain probably isn't notable. A redirect from the correct spelling would make sense, but I don't think we should be propagating an error by having this spelling. Hog Farm Talk 14:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Agree - should probably have written "a redirect makes a lot of sense, from the correct spelling."
SportingFlyer
T·
C
15:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- And a redirect from the wrong spelling too, since its propagated around the internet, even to internet word search websites! ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 15:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Agree - should probably have written "a redirect makes a lot of sense, from the correct spelling."
SportingFlyer
T·
C
15:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.