From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 04:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Cel-Sci Corp.

Cel-Sci Corp. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP - no detailed secondary sources about the company, just listings in stock price databases, two papers about a drug and a PR Newswire press release. McGeddon ( talk) 11:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG generally - I searched news and web sources, found only stock listings and self-generated news releases that were not carried by syndication. -- Scray ( talk) 02:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete Their therapy is not yet approved. DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 04:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Cel-Sci Corp.

Cel-Sci Corp. (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP - no detailed secondary sources about the company, just listings in stock price databases, two papers about a drug and a PR Newswire press release. McGeddon ( talk) 11:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:05, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG generally - I searched news and web sources, found only stock listings and self-generated news releases that were not carried by syndication. -- Scray ( talk) 02:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Delete Their therapy is not yet approved. DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 21 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook