The result was no consensus. There is no consensus for deletion. The article has improved since nomination, and there are sources in the article and available though not yet in the article to assert notability. Defaulting to keep. SilkTork ✔Tea time 01:20, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply
While the organisation is doubtless laudable the article has been uncited since creation and flagged as such for almost a year. The article is a promotional essay and a link farm to the directors. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 09:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There is no consensus for deletion. The article has improved since nomination, and there are sources in the article and available though not yet in the article to assert notability. Defaulting to keep. SilkTork ✔Tea time 01:20, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply
While the organisation is doubtless laudable the article has been uncited since creation and flagged as such for almost a year. The article is a promotional essay and a link farm to the directors. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 09:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC) reply