- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cartoonists Remember 9/11 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:LISTN. The article sounds more like a short statistical overview of comic strips paying tribute to September 11th on the 10th anniversary, not an encyclopedic entry. Pahiy ( talk) 15:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, a quick google says the event itself is notable (and also an event rather than just spontaneous actions to commemorate the 10th anniversary of 9/11 by cartoonists) and I don’t see this is being a list. AfD is not cleanup and thats what this page needs, not deletion. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 15:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, however, judging by the looks of it, I think it should actually come as a mention in the 9/11 article. This will make a lot more sense, since this is more of a short summary of the subject. JTZegers ( talk) 18:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This got news coverage at the time. I added some more content to the article, based on the following sources:
- " Cartoonists plan anniversary tribute for terror victims", The Des Moines Register (Sept 3, 2011)
- " Sunday comics to feature more serious tone", The Tribune (Sept 10, 2011)
- " Cartoonists Join Together for 9/11 Tribute", Huffington Post (Aug 30, 2011)
- " Comic strips to focus on 9/11", Los Angeles Times (Aug 31, 2011)
- " Museums & 9/11 Exhibits", Daily News (Sept 9, 2011)
- (Note: The Huffington Post article is free to view; the other links are unfortunately paywalled from Newspapers.com.) I believe that this demonstrates notability. —
Toughpigs (
talk)
20:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for improving the article, I don’t think there is a legitimate question about wikipedia worthiness anymore. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 14:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This even made international news from newspaper outlets El Comercio (Peru): [1] and Der Tagesspiegel: [2]. Another piece on non-paywalled English coverage from ABC News: [3]. The sources clearly WP:NEXIST to satisfy GNG. LISTN isn't necessary since this is more than a list, but both the El Comercio and ABC News pieces contribute to satisfying LISTN as a discussion of the grouping as well. - 2pou ( talk) 16:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep mostly per Horse Eye Jack. The subject is fairly notable. Raymond3023 ( talk) 15:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep notable enough to pass GNG. Multiple mentions in RS MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 17:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cartoonists Remember 9/11 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:LISTN. The article sounds more like a short statistical overview of comic strips paying tribute to September 11th on the 10th anniversary, not an encyclopedic entry. Pahiy ( talk) 15:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, a quick google says the event itself is notable (and also an event rather than just spontaneous actions to commemorate the 10th anniversary of 9/11 by cartoonists) and I don’t see this is being a list. AfD is not cleanup and thats what this page needs, not deletion. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 15:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, however, judging by the looks of it, I think it should actually come as a mention in the 9/11 article. This will make a lot more sense, since this is more of a short summary of the subject. JTZegers ( talk) 18:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: This got news coverage at the time. I added some more content to the article, based on the following sources:
- " Cartoonists plan anniversary tribute for terror victims", The Des Moines Register (Sept 3, 2011)
- " Sunday comics to feature more serious tone", The Tribune (Sept 10, 2011)
- " Cartoonists Join Together for 9/11 Tribute", Huffington Post (Aug 30, 2011)
- " Comic strips to focus on 9/11", Los Angeles Times (Aug 31, 2011)
- " Museums & 9/11 Exhibits", Daily News (Sept 9, 2011)
- (Note: The Huffington Post article is free to view; the other links are unfortunately paywalled from Newspapers.com.) I believe that this demonstrates notability. —
Toughpigs (
talk)
20:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for improving the article, I don’t think there is a legitimate question about wikipedia worthiness anymore. Horse Eye Jack ( talk) 14:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep This even made international news from newspaper outlets El Comercio (Peru): [1] and Der Tagesspiegel: [2]. Another piece on non-paywalled English coverage from ABC News: [3]. The sources clearly WP:NEXIST to satisfy GNG. LISTN isn't necessary since this is more than a list, but both the El Comercio and ABC News pieces contribute to satisfying LISTN as a discussion of the grouping as well. - 2pou ( talk) 16:35, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep mostly per Horse Eye Jack. The subject is fairly notable. Raymond3023 ( talk) 15:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep notable enough to pass GNG. Multiple mentions in RS MistyGraceWhite ( talk) 17:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.