- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu. j⚛e decker talk 14:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Carrefour Richelieu
- Carrefour Richelieu ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN 455,035 sq ft mall. Was PRODed, but PROD was removed. Epeefleche ( talk) 03:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable per nom. Some coverage on local listing websites but nothing reliable. Philg88 ♦ talk 06:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Neither of the references cited in the article establish that is passes WP:GNG -- RoySmith (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu. One can look at the size of this mall, over 400,000 sq ft, and know that it is a regional mall, which based on the U.S. standards of icsc.org [1], mark it in the top 2% of centers. Regional malls impact a wide area and also tend to be venues, so wp:notability won't be a policy-based criteria for deletion...as indicated by WP:ATD, a non-notable but wp:prominent topic should be a redirect, in this case with the template "R with possibilities". The topic is already included in the article. Unscintillating ( talk) 00:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. The consensus, as reflected in the discussion here at "Common Outcomes; Malls", is that we don't generally retain stand-alone articles of malls below 500K square feet (at least; some editors believe the cutoff is higher) -- which this is clearly below. Epeefleche ( talk) 04:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu. j⚛e decker talk 14:40, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Carrefour Richelieu
- Carrefour Richelieu ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN 455,035 sq ft mall. Was PRODed, but PROD was removed. Epeefleche ( talk) 03:08, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable per nom. Some coverage on local listing websites but nothing reliable. Philg88 ♦ talk 06:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Neither of the references cited in the article establish that is passes WP:GNG -- RoySmith (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu. One can look at the size of this mall, over 400,000 sq ft, and know that it is a regional mall, which based on the U.S. standards of icsc.org [1], mark it in the top 2% of centers. Regional malls impact a wide area and also tend to be venues, so wp:notability won't be a policy-based criteria for deletion...as indicated by WP:ATD, a non-notable but wp:prominent topic should be a redirect, in this case with the template "R with possibilities". The topic is already included in the article. Unscintillating ( talk) 00:07, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. The consensus, as reflected in the discussion here at "Common Outcomes; Malls", is that we don't generally retain stand-alone articles of malls below 500K square feet (at least; some editors believe the cutoff is higher) -- which this is clearly below. Epeefleche ( talk) 04:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.