- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 07:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Carolina Herrera Spring 2014 Ready-to-Wear Collection ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article describes one designer's show at a NY Fashion Week event in 2013 but fails WP:EVENT for lasting effects and geographic scope. It doesn't describe anything that might make this presentation stand out from other designers or if it had any effect on clothing trends, e.g. Dior's "New Look" Blue Riband► 02:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Blue Riband► 02:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk) 03:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete While it seems to have had multiple mentions, they are all at the same time (well, over 2 days probably due to slight differences in publishing schedule). I think this sort of thing should start as a section on an article about the line of clothing being showcased and only expanded if it was non-routine (say the venue caught fire because the dresses were all made of parafin and were stacked too close to an incandescent lightbulb). Rockphed ( talk) 13:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:NOTNEWSPAPER - coverage is routine for a fashion event - one-time event, no sustained coverage WP:SUSTAINED - Epinoia ( talk) 01:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 07:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Carolina Herrera Spring 2014 Ready-to-Wear Collection ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article describes one designer's show at a NY Fashion Week event in 2013 but fails WP:EVENT for lasting effects and geographic scope. It doesn't describe anything that might make this presentation stand out from other designers or if it had any effect on clothing trends, e.g. Dior's "New Look" Blue Riband► 02:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Blue Riband► 02:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk) 03:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete While it seems to have had multiple mentions, they are all at the same time (well, over 2 days probably due to slight differences in publishing schedule). I think this sort of thing should start as a section on an article about the line of clothing being showcased and only expanded if it was non-routine (say the venue caught fire because the dresses were all made of parafin and were stacked too close to an incandescent lightbulb). Rockphed ( talk) 13:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:NOTNEWSPAPER - coverage is routine for a fashion event - one-time event, no sustained coverage WP:SUSTAINED - Epinoia ( talk) 01:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.