From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger ( talk) 10:31, 29 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Carl and Willard station

Carl and Willard station (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-existent light rail station. It is not a current stop, nor is any information available to prove that it even was a former stop. (Contrast, for example, Taraval and 28th Avenue station, a recently discontinued stop on the same system with two well-sourced paragraphs.) This likely was a stop decades ago when trains on this system stopped at every cross street, but since it didn't last long enough into the modern era to have any available sources, it fails GNG. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 22:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Having lived a few blocks from that intersection I can attest that there's no stop/station there. The lede in the article is just false. Even the official route map doesn't indicat a stop. [1] There's no evidence this was an actual station beyond the possibility of a stop if it stopped at all corners as the nom suggested. -- Oakshade ( talk) 06:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, if not Speedy under G3 as above. Night fury 13:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Non-existent light rail station. The article has no sources and I could not find any either. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per Oakshade. South Nashua ( talk) 03:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. -- do ncr am 00:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger ( talk) 10:31, 29 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Carl and Willard station

Carl and Willard station (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-existent light rail station. It is not a current stop, nor is any information available to prove that it even was a former stop. (Contrast, for example, Taraval and 28th Avenue station, a recently discontinued stop on the same system with two well-sourced paragraphs.) This likely was a stop decades ago when trains on this system stopped at every cross street, but since it didn't last long enough into the modern era to have any available sources, it fails GNG. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 22:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Having lived a few blocks from that intersection I can attest that there's no stop/station there. The lede in the article is just false. Even the official route map doesn't indicat a stop. [1] There's no evidence this was an actual station beyond the possibility of a stop if it stopped at all corners as the nom suggested. -- Oakshade ( talk) 06:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, if not Speedy under G3 as above. Night fury 13:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Non-existent light rail station. The article has no sources and I could not find any either. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per Oakshade. South Nashua ( talk) 03:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. -- do ncr am 00:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook