The result was redirect to Captain Underpants. Mark Arsten ( talk) 16:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Sigh. As much as i *love* the captain Underpants saga, one must admit that it fails WP:NB in many ways. The article consists of nothing but plot summaries and character listings and stuff, nothing past that. Not a bestseller, *obviously* not the subject of instruction at major schools, poorly unreferenced, not mentioned by other third party sources, just a silly childrens book. But other than a delete, we can afford a redirect to Captain Underpants. Bonkers The Clown ( talk) 08:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Captain Underpants. Mark Arsten ( talk) 16:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Sigh. As much as i *love* the captain Underpants saga, one must admit that it fails WP:NB in many ways. The article consists of nothing but plot summaries and character listings and stuff, nothing past that. Not a bestseller, *obviously* not the subject of instruction at major schools, poorly unreferenced, not mentioned by other third party sources, just a silly childrens book. But other than a delete, we can afford a redirect to Captain Underpants. Bonkers The Clown ( talk) 08:19, 29 September 2012 (UTC) reply