- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cape Romano Pyramid House ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article relies entirely on a single source, and when I went looking for more sources to confirm the demolition and the demolition date (I've been updating demolition category tags) I found absolutely nothing aside from one exceptionally brief mention here. Fails WP:GNG. (EDIT: was surprised to see this was the second AfD on the article, but the first one was a no consensus without a particularly compelling argument to keep.) SportingFlyer T· C 01:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T· C 01:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T· C 01:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The structure is, was, a long way from notability. The wistful Floridian details (Monte just disappeared -- ?) are perfect for the newspaper article it came from, but not in an encyclopedia. -- Lockley ( talk) 19:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability aside from single source. – dlthewave ☎ 17:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:28, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cape Romano Pyramid House ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article relies entirely on a single source, and when I went looking for more sources to confirm the demolition and the demolition date (I've been updating demolition category tags) I found absolutely nothing aside from one exceptionally brief mention here. Fails WP:GNG. (EDIT: was surprised to see this was the second AfD on the article, but the first one was a no consensus without a particularly compelling argument to keep.) SportingFlyer T· C 01:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T· C 01:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T· C 01:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:44, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The structure is, was, a long way from notability. The wistful Floridian details (Monte just disappeared -- ?) are perfect for the newspaper article it came from, but not in an encyclopedia. -- Lockley ( talk) 19:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notability aside from single source. – dlthewave ☎ 17:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.