@
JWilz12345, I know that it is an administrative division, which is why I am saying that it meets
WP:GEOLAND per [p]opulated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable. I am using the guideline as a justification for my !vote, and the discussion you linked to was not officially closed, nor was it an official RfC in any way, so at this point
WP:GEOLAND is the guideline to follow for this article. Yes, it lacks coverage, but it is presumed notable per GEOLAND.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Cocobb8 so, in your opinion, is
Barangay 51, Caloocan (
list of Caloocan's barangays) notable too? It is a legal administrative division, with a chief local executive (a "barangay captain or chairman") and a set of elected councilors ("barangay kagawad"). The country has more than 40,000
barangays or administrative wards of the country's 1,634 incorporated places. Hard to maintain all 40K+ articles as per some concerns raised by Filipino Wikipedians in debates concerning articles of barangays of the Philippines. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)15:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Clarification: Barangays are not just "administrative" divisions like regions, but are full fledged political units like towns, cities and provinces.
WP:GEOLAND has a funky definition of a "settlement". Barangay 666 in
Manila is not a
WP:GEOLAND settlement, as it along with 800 barangays of Manila, and perhaps 90% of the barangays in
Mega Manila, are one contiguous urban sprawl. Standalone barangays in the hinterlands are
WP:GEOLAND settlements if the built up area is not contiguous with the primary settlement in the town center. The question is if
WP:GEOLAND is good enough if we can't write an article because there's no
WP:SIGCOV from an
WP:RS.
Howard the Duck (
talk)
07:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Howard the Duck maybe because the Philippine LGU system when it comes to municipal level is not intended as it was originally used to be.
The article for the Philippine towns speaks of a former type of "town" called "municipal districts" that were mostly found in far-flung or remote areas. They were unincorporated (similar to U.S.
census designated places) and were managed by tribal chieftains. It was after World War II that these unincorporated regions/districts within the provinces began to be converted to regular towns or municipalities, even those that do not comprise a single settlement but multiple barangay settlements that may not be contiguous to each other. The last of the conversions to regular municipalities were in the 1980s.
@
JWilz12345, it's not about whether that is the case for other small administrative divisions. That is a larger-scale discussion, and that is not the purpose of this AfD. As I said before, I would still keep this as per the sources I found.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
17:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
There was a previous barangay AFD like this one, and Barangay 666 in Manila is not a "settlement" for GEOLAND purposes but villages that are built up separately are. I don't have a computer with me and I won't be bothered to look it up on mobile.
Howard the Duck (
talk)
09:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Cansolabao is also a village. The article should be reworked and sources added, but a village with 1,200 people would be notable in a country where the administrative boundaries aren't in wiki-dispute.
SportingFlyerT·C15:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
WP:GNG does not actually override WP:GEOLAND - WP:GEOLAND is one of the rare exceptions and simply requires verification that this is a populated place.
SportingFlyerT·C05:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
JWilz12345, I know that it is an administrative division, which is why I am saying that it meets
WP:GEOLAND per [p]opulated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable. I am using the guideline as a justification for my !vote, and the discussion you linked to was not officially closed, nor was it an official RfC in any way, so at this point
WP:GEOLAND is the guideline to follow for this article. Yes, it lacks coverage, but it is presumed notable per GEOLAND.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Cocobb8 so, in your opinion, is
Barangay 51, Caloocan (
list of Caloocan's barangays) notable too? It is a legal administrative division, with a chief local executive (a "barangay captain or chairman") and a set of elected councilors ("barangay kagawad"). The country has more than 40,000
barangays or administrative wards of the country's 1,634 incorporated places. Hard to maintain all 40K+ articles as per some concerns raised by Filipino Wikipedians in debates concerning articles of barangays of the Philippines. JWilz12345(Talk|Contrib's.)15:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Clarification: Barangays are not just "administrative" divisions like regions, but are full fledged political units like towns, cities and provinces.
WP:GEOLAND has a funky definition of a "settlement". Barangay 666 in
Manila is not a
WP:GEOLAND settlement, as it along with 800 barangays of Manila, and perhaps 90% of the barangays in
Mega Manila, are one contiguous urban sprawl. Standalone barangays in the hinterlands are
WP:GEOLAND settlements if the built up area is not contiguous with the primary settlement in the town center. The question is if
WP:GEOLAND is good enough if we can't write an article because there's no
WP:SIGCOV from an
WP:RS.
Howard the Duck (
talk)
07:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Howard the Duck maybe because the Philippine LGU system when it comes to municipal level is not intended as it was originally used to be.
The article for the Philippine towns speaks of a former type of "town" called "municipal districts" that were mostly found in far-flung or remote areas. They were unincorporated (similar to U.S.
census designated places) and were managed by tribal chieftains. It was after World War II that these unincorporated regions/districts within the provinces began to be converted to regular towns or municipalities, even those that do not comprise a single settlement but multiple barangay settlements that may not be contiguous to each other. The last of the conversions to regular municipalities were in the 1980s.
@
JWilz12345, it's not about whether that is the case for other small administrative divisions. That is a larger-scale discussion, and that is not the purpose of this AfD. As I said before, I would still keep this as per the sources I found.
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
17:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
There was a previous barangay AFD like this one, and Barangay 666 in Manila is not a "settlement" for GEOLAND purposes but villages that are built up separately are. I don't have a computer with me and I won't be bothered to look it up on mobile.
Howard the Duck (
talk)
09:01, 28 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Cansolabao is also a village. The article should be reworked and sources added, but a village with 1,200 people would be notable in a country where the administrative boundaries aren't in wiki-dispute.
SportingFlyerT·C15:54, 25 June 2024 (UTC)reply
WP:GNG does not actually override WP:GEOLAND - WP:GEOLAND is one of the rare exceptions and simply requires verification that this is a populated place.
SportingFlyerT·C05:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)reply