The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Current sources on this article are direct from the organization. A quick search only turns up one reliable result that's blocked by a paywall. Fails
WP:CORP and
WP:GNG.
jd22292(Jalen D. Folf) (
talk •
contribs) 21:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
No opinion yet, although this does smell a bit of
WP:CRYSTAL. But just so it's clear, paywalled sites are entirely acceptable as references. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 00:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment I am seeing two OK sources about the announcement:
this and
this. There is also a bit of more
WP:ROUTINE coverage in
this. I would likely say it is
WP:TOOSOON as they don't have a single team and have not generated much in the way of coverage from very reliable sources. But others may feel differently.
Yosemiter (
talk) 00:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH with lack of significant coverage from multiple independent sources. I could not find more than the 2 sources already mentioned above by Yosemiter. Perhaps it is just
WP:TOOSOON if the league finally takes off at some point.—
Bagumba (
talk) 13:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as per above. There's not enough information or coverage about the league yet to have an article, and it's
WP:CRYSTAL to assume it will ever function as a football league.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 20:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Current sources on this article are direct from the organization. A quick search only turns up one reliable result that's blocked by a paywall. Fails
WP:CORP and
WP:GNG.
jd22292(Jalen D. Folf) (
talk •
contribs) 21:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)reply
No opinion yet, although this does smell a bit of
WP:CRYSTAL. But just so it's clear, paywalled sites are entirely acceptable as references. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 00:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment I am seeing two OK sources about the announcement:
this and
this. There is also a bit of more
WP:ROUTINE coverage in
this. I would likely say it is
WP:TOOSOON as they don't have a single team and have not generated much in the way of coverage from very reliable sources. But others may feel differently.
Yosemiter (
talk) 00:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORPDEPTH with lack of significant coverage from multiple independent sources. I could not find more than the 2 sources already mentioned above by Yosemiter. Perhaps it is just
WP:TOOSOON if the league finally takes off at some point.—
Bagumba (
talk) 13:34, 17 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as per above. There's not enough information or coverage about the league yet to have an article, and it's
WP:CRYSTAL to assume it will ever function as a football league.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 20:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.