- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Camila Loures
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Camila Loures ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was deleted under WP:A7, and reviewed at DRV, where the outcome was to list at AfD. My listing here is a purely administrative action; I am neutral. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this biography of a living person lacks sourcing. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 21:47, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 21:47, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- comment - After a quick google, there appear to potentially be sources in Portuguese. As I do not read Portuguese, I cannot evaluate whether these sources are reliable. This AfD needs attention from a Portuguese speaker. Samsmachado ( talk) 23:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Samsmachado ( talk) 23:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Tentative Delete based only on the sources currently in the article. The first two (based on google translate) are both about Loures's purchase of a house in which to do recordings, and lack any significant coverage. The third more closely approaches SIGCOV, but seems a bit short of qualifing -- in any case it is only a single source. The fourth confirms an award, but says nothing else. I don't know how significant that award is, but I doubt it establishes notability on its own. Should additional significant reliable sources be presented, this view may be considered canceled as far as any such sources are concerned. I have not searched for additional sources myself. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 19:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow further assessment of available sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost ( talk) 02:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: To allow further assessment of available sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost ( talk) 02:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Note: the article was created by CharliAmelio ( talk · contribs), blocked on pt.wiki for being a puppet of Irisvalverde1 ( talk · contribs) (long term abuse in: pt, en, es wiki and commons). Edmond Dantès d'un message? 13:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The Brazilian media is full of sources of gossip, triviality or rumors. In this case, most of the sources are reliable; traditional mechanisms in the Brazilian media that surrender to publishing trivial news. None of the sources attest to notoriety outside the Youtube-Instagram cycle. Well, the situation gets worse because the sources only mention that "YouTube is so successful, so many followers on Instagram"... Edmond Dantès d'un message? 13:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Edmond Dantès. She's mentioned in a number of articles (in Brazilian), but was barely talked about. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 08:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Camila Loures
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Camila Loures ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was deleted under WP:A7, and reviewed at DRV, where the outcome was to list at AfD. My listing here is a purely administrative action; I am neutral. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete this biography of a living person lacks sourcing. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 21:47, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 21:47, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- comment - After a quick google, there appear to potentially be sources in Portuguese. As I do not read Portuguese, I cannot evaluate whether these sources are reliable. This AfD needs attention from a Portuguese speaker. Samsmachado ( talk) 23:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Samsmachado ( talk) 23:55, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Tentative Delete based only on the sources currently in the article. The first two (based on google translate) are both about Loures's purchase of a house in which to do recordings, and lack any significant coverage. The third more closely approaches SIGCOV, but seems a bit short of qualifing -- in any case it is only a single source. The fourth confirms an award, but says nothing else. I don't know how significant that award is, but I doubt it establishes notability on its own. Should additional significant reliable sources be presented, this view may be considered canceled as far as any such sources are concerned. I have not searched for additional sources myself. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 19:13, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow further assessment of available sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost ( talk) 02:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: To allow further assessment of available sources
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost ( talk) 02:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Note: the article was created by CharliAmelio ( talk · contribs), blocked on pt.wiki for being a puppet of Irisvalverde1 ( talk · contribs) (long term abuse in: pt, en, es wiki and commons). Edmond Dantès d'un message? 13:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The Brazilian media is full of sources of gossip, triviality or rumors. In this case, most of the sources are reliable; traditional mechanisms in the Brazilian media that surrender to publishing trivial news. None of the sources attest to notoriety outside the Youtube-Instagram cycle. Well, the situation gets worse because the sources only mention that "YouTube is so successful, so many followers on Instagram"... Edmond Dantès d'un message? 13:00, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Edmond Dantès. She's mentioned in a number of articles (in Brazilian), but was barely talked about. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 08:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.