- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 09:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Cami Dalton
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cami Dalton ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. The two reviews are by defunct and apparently unreliable sources, and the award for which she (he?) was nominated is from Reviewers International, for which I can find no trace. Clarityfiend ( talk) 05:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 07:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not enough coverage to show notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Romantic Times closed in 2018, but for decades they were one of the premier publications covering the romance novel genre and hosted a large industry-wide convention every year. Being nominated for a Romantic Times award was a big deal. Road to Romance was likewise a well-known and respected publication focused on romance novels. Karanacs ( talk) 16:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 22:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Karanacs's well reasoned and well researched argument. Archives of Reviewers International (which also seems to be defunct) can be found here. pburka ( talk) 13:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 09:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Cami Dalton
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cami Dalton ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. The two reviews are by defunct and apparently unreliable sources, and the award for which she (he?) was nominated is from Reviewers International, for which I can find no trace. Clarityfiend ( talk) 05:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 07:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not enough coverage to show notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Romantic Times closed in 2018, but for decades they were one of the premier publications covering the romance novel genre and hosted a large industry-wide convention every year. Being nominated for a Romantic Times award was a big deal. Road to Romance was likewise a well-known and respected publication focused on romance novels. Karanacs ( talk) 16:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 22:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Karanacs's well reasoned and well researched argument. Archives of Reviewers International (which also seems to be defunct) can be found here. pburka ( talk) 13:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.