- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Cambodia–Poland relations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambodia–Poland relations, then recreated by a user now blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. As far as I remember, the new article is not much different from its previous incarnation. It's poorly researched and poorly sourced (that sources that are cited do not support what the article says). — Kpalion (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Poorly sourced. I do not see much in my BEFORE. Relations seems to be fairly limited for these quite far apart countries. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. Per above--I'm not seeing the significant coverage in reliable third-party source that is required to establish notability. Yilloslime ( talk) 16:14, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Cambodia–Poland relations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambodia–Poland relations, then recreated by a user now blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. As far as I remember, the new article is not much different from its previous incarnation. It's poorly researched and poorly sourced (that sources that are cited do not support what the article says). — Kpalion (talk) 16:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. — Kpalion (talk) 23:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Poorly sourced. I do not see much in my BEFORE. Relations seems to be fairly limited for these quite far apart countries. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. Per above--I'm not seeing the significant coverage in reliable third-party source that is required to establish notability. Yilloslime ( talk) 16:14, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.