The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article doesn't show notability and I couldn't find anything else after a Google search to prove that it warrants its own article.
Suonii180 (
talk)
17:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Addingreply
Keep Camberwell Junction - it's a listed place on the Victorian Heritage Register and there are sources about it, so the Google search the nominator apparently did wasn't particularly good (I found this with less than a minute of searching for it), e.g.
here. Reywas92, calling something "utter junk" is not helpful, just say something is notable or not instead of name-calling.
Deus et lex (
talk)
02:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
I tend to agree with this keep although it means rewriting this as a completely different article about a historic district (which incidentally is not in Melbourne). As it stands there's no claim to notability, so it's not terribly surprising that people took that at face value. The others should be deleted.
Mangoe (
talk)
04:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article doesn't show notability and I couldn't find anything else after a Google search to prove that it warrants its own article.
Suonii180 (
talk)
17:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Addingreply
Keep Camberwell Junction - it's a listed place on the Victorian Heritage Register and there are sources about it, so the Google search the nominator apparently did wasn't particularly good (I found this with less than a minute of searching for it), e.g.
here. Reywas92, calling something "utter junk" is not helpful, just say something is notable or not instead of name-calling.
Deus et lex (
talk)
02:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
I tend to agree with this keep although it means rewriting this as a completely different article about a historic district (which incidentally is not in Melbourne). As it stands there's no claim to notability, so it's not terribly surprising that people took that at face value. The others should be deleted.
Mangoe (
talk)
04:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.