The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What's that Afd got to do with anything? Where does policy say "leniency" is granted? Can you explain what is the difference in the topic between "calls for the destruction of Israel" and "anti-zionism" (
defined as opposition to the existence of Israel in its current form). VR(Please
ping on reply)02:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Topics being related or overlapping somewhat doesn't make this article a fork; that would be if we already had a page like
Opposition to Israel's existence.
I agree that this conflict area has spawned a lot of articles focusing on rather trivial individual aspects thereof, and it might be better to merge some of them into longer and more general pages, but that's not an AFD question so long as each article in question does cover a distinctly notable topic. Maybe start a discussion over at
WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration?
PrimaPrime (
talk)
23:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep – The sensitivity of the subject is understandable, but the article discusses a recurring social phenomenon. The charge must be for scope neutrality, not for deletion.
Svartner (
talk)
20:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep and close. The AfD justification is word-for-word the same as
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human rights violations against Palestinians by Israel, an article created by the nominator. In this case, the justification has nothing to do with the article nominated. For example, there's nothing in this article about the "Palestinians do X," or is this article a
WP:POVFORK of any article. What are the article-specific examples of a policy-based justification for AfD? This reads as
WP:Tendentious
By the way, I noticed that the opening phrase of both was first (I assume) recently used by myself in an impulsive random patrol AfD in this topic area that was closed as speedy keep without votes…
These are two separate concepts, unfortunately muddied in today's politicized discourse where the meaning of ideas doesn't matter anymore.
Longhornsg (
talk)
02:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What's that Afd got to do with anything? Where does policy say "leniency" is granted? Can you explain what is the difference in the topic between "calls for the destruction of Israel" and "anti-zionism" (
defined as opposition to the existence of Israel in its current form). VR(Please
ping on reply)02:29, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Topics being related or overlapping somewhat doesn't make this article a fork; that would be if we already had a page like
Opposition to Israel's existence.
I agree that this conflict area has spawned a lot of articles focusing on rather trivial individual aspects thereof, and it might be better to merge some of them into longer and more general pages, but that's not an AFD question so long as each article in question does cover a distinctly notable topic. Maybe start a discussion over at
WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration?
PrimaPrime (
talk)
23:04, 15 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep – The sensitivity of the subject is understandable, but the article discusses a recurring social phenomenon. The charge must be for scope neutrality, not for deletion.
Svartner (
talk)
20:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep and close. The AfD justification is word-for-word the same as
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human rights violations against Palestinians by Israel, an article created by the nominator. In this case, the justification has nothing to do with the article nominated. For example, there's nothing in this article about the "Palestinians do X," or is this article a
WP:POVFORK of any article. What are the article-specific examples of a policy-based justification for AfD? This reads as
WP:Tendentious
By the way, I noticed that the opening phrase of both was first (I assume) recently used by myself in an impulsive random patrol AfD in this topic area that was closed as speedy keep without votes…
These are two separate concepts, unfortunately muddied in today's politicized discourse where the meaning of ideas doesn't matter anymore.
Longhornsg (
talk)
02:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.